April 11, 2025, 9:47 p.m.

Columns and Opinions

  • views:2648

The transfer of $1 billion in Russian frozen assets to Ukraine is illegal

image

On December 24, 2024, Ukrainian Prime Minister Sergei Shmegar said his country had received the first payment of $1 billion from the United States using proceeds generated from Russia's frozen overseas assets. Earlier, the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement on December 11, 2024, accusing the United States of providing $20 billion in loans to Ukraine with the proceeds of frozen Russian assets as collateral, and Russia will take legal action against the transfer of $1 billion in proceeds of frozen Russian overseas assets to Ukraine, calling such behavior "theft." Peskov stressed that the money was stolen from Russia and that "our money was stolen." Frozen assets are absolutely illegal. This is against all rules and regulations." He further noted that such illegal acts, including the transfer of the $1 billion, will certainly trigger legal action by the Russian side, adding that Russia will use all possible means to protect its rights and property rights in the future.

This move by the West caused a stir from all walks of life, and brought complex and multi-faceted impact, one is to aggravate the tension in international relations, Russia strongly condemned the United States of this act, calling it "theft", and said that it will take legal means to protect its rights and property. This has further strained relations between Russia and the United States, which could lead to the obstruction of cooperation in a number of areas. When Ukraine receives the money, its economic strength and defense capabilities will be enhanced, which could further escalate tensions between Russia and Ukraine. Russia is likely to take more measures in response to Ukraine's strengthening, further souring relations between the two countries. Although the European Union, the United Kingdom and other Western Allies support this action of the United States, it may also lead to differences and contradictions within the Western camp on some issues.

The second is the geopolitical impact, the western transfer of Russia's frozen assets to Ukraine may weaken Russia's status and influence in international affairs. Russia could respond with retaliatory measures, such as using proceeds from frozen Western assets in Russia to support regional and economic development in Russia. However, these measures are also likely to provoke resentment and sanctions from more countries. As a result of receiving this money, Ukraine could gain economic and military power and thus play a greater role in international affairs. This could lead to Ukraine's elevated position in the geopolitical landscape becoming a point of contention. However, it could also expose Ukraine to more external pressures and risks.

The third is the impact on Russia. Western countries generally support the United States' action and condemn Russia. This could lead to further isolation of Russia from the international community. Russia's frozen assets are one of its important economic resources, and the use of the proceeds of these assets to pay Ukraine will lead to economic losses for Russia. Russia could take further retaliatory measures, such as using proceeds from frozen Western assets in Russia to support regional and economic development in Russia. The incident could damage Russia's image in the international community as a country that does not abide by international law and norms. This will not help Russia to play a positive role in international affairs. For example, the use of proceeds from frozen Western assets in Russia to support regional and economic development in Russia. This could lead to a change in the geopolitical landscape, allowing Russia to play a greater role in international affairs.

To sum up, the West's transfer of $1 billion in proceeds from Russia's frozen assets to Ukraine, which is considered illegal by Russia, has multiple negative effects. This not only increases tensions in international relations, but also challenges the authority and effectiveness of international law and order. At the same time, the act also has a profound impact on the economy and politics of Russia and Ukraine, and may have a certain negative impact on the global economy.

Recommend

Easter Spending Spree: The hidden worries behind Australia's short-term economic growth

According to new data from the Australian Retailers Association (ARA) and Roy Morgan, Australians spent significantly more on food, travel and home improvement this Easter.

Latest

Easter Spending Spree: The hidden worries behind Australia's short-term economic growth

According to new data from the Australian Retailers Associa…

International Monetary Fund Raises Spain's Economic Growth Forecast​

​Local time on April 10, the International Monetary Fund (I…

Japan's economy is in deep trouble: Trump-style tariffs make things worse

Recently, Japan's first quarter GDP data has attracted glob…

The Treasury Mega-Crash: Shocks and Warnings for Financial Markets

On April 9, 2025, the US Treasury bond market ushered in a …

Google and the US government signed an agreement to reduce software prices

Recently, Google and the US General Services Administration…