Global regulation of artificial intelligence ushered in a blockbuster moment

Recently, the global governance of artificial intelligence (AI) has become the focus of attention, and a series of conventions, regulations and intergovernmental dialogue meetings have been held intensively, marking the regulation of artificial intelligence has entered a critical stage.

First, at the international level, on Tuesday, South Korea co-hosted the second AI Security Summit with the United Kingdom, which aims to delve into AI security issues and the potential capabilities of advanced models. At the same time, the European Council also adopted the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, which sets a timetable for the implementation of relevant rules. The adoption of this bill marks the EU's active exploration and firm determination in the field of artificial intelligence regulation.

In addition, the Council of Europe recently adopted a legally binding AI convention, which is regarded as the first international treaty in the field of AI, and its attitude of openness for signature shows a friendly attitude towards non-European countries. At the same time, China and the United States also launched an intergovernmental dialogue in the field of artificial intelligence, and the two sides had in-depth, professional and constructive exchanges on scientific and technological risks, global governance and issues of respective concern.

Despite the many challenges facing the promotion of AI governance, efforts at the international level have not stopped. From the OECD to the United Nations, efforts are being made to find a "common denominator" for regulation, with a view to forming a unified standard for AI governance globally.

Specifically, the Council of Europe's AI Convention proposes a comprehensive legal framework aimed at promoting responsible technological innovation while addressing potential technological risks. The Convention emphasizes comprehensive regulation of the life cycle of AI systems, requiring careful consideration of any potential negative consequences of using AI systems. This approach is consistent with the risk-based approach adopted in the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act, and reflects the EU's forward-looking and systematic approach to AI regulation.

At the same time, the signing of the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act will also have a profound impact on global AI regulation. As the world's first comprehensive regulatory regulations in the field of AI, the introduction of the bill means that the supervision of the field of AI will enter a more standardized and strict stage. Those who violate the regulations will face severe penalties, which will have a positive role in promoting the healthy development of the AI industry.

It is worth noting that the innovation of the EU in the regulation of the digital economy is not only reflected in the specific regulatory measures, but also the "Brussels effect" of its rules output is becoming increasingly prominent. From GDPR to the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act to the Artificial Intelligence Act, EU regulatory innovation in the digital economy continues to drive rule-making and reform across the globe.

At the first meeting of the China-Us Intergovernmental Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence, the two sides had in-depth exchanges on their respective views on the risks of artificial intelligence technology and governance measures. China emphasizes the concept of putting people first and smart for good, and is willing to strengthen communication and coordination with the international community, including the United States, to form a global AI governance framework and standards and norms with broad consensus. This statement shows China's positive attitude and open attitude in the field of AI governance.

From a global perspective, the second Artificial Intelligence Security Summit will further promote cooperation and exchanges in the field of AI. The Bletchley Declaration, issued at the first summit in November last year, highlighted the international nature of AI risks and the importance of addressing them through international cooperation. Participating countries and regions agreed to work together to build an internationally inclusive network of cutting-edge AI security science research to deepen understanding of AI risks and capabilities.

However, despite some consensus and progress in AI governance globally, commonalities and differences in AI governance between countries still exist. The concepts and practices of AI governance in Europe and the United States have certain commonalities, such as emphasizing the comprehensive supervision and prevention of AI risks. However, in terms of specific implementation, due to differences in legal systems, social situations and cultural backgrounds in various countries, the specific measures and effects of AI governance will also be different.

Therefore, the future promotion of global AI governance requires countries to strengthen communication and collaboration on the basis of respecting each other's differences, and jointly find solutions that meet the interests of all parties. At the same time, countries should also actively explore AI governance paths suitable for their national conditions, promote the healthy development of AI technology and benefit human society.

Global regulation of artificial intelligence is having a blockbuster moment. From the conventions and regulations at the international level to the intensive holding of intergovernmental dialogue meetings, to the active exploration and attempts of various countries in AI governance, all show that the world attaches great importance to and expects AI governance. In the future, with the continuous progress of technology and the continuous expansion of application scenarios, AI governance will face more challenges and opportunities.