From NVIDIA's "China special chip" to talk about the twists and turns in scientific and technological cooperation and the pursuit of global win-win

In today's increasingly globalized technology field, a high-profile news has attracted wide attention: Nvidia has once again launched "China-specific" chips. This incident is not only a simple business decision of an enterprise, but also many deep-seated problems behind it, which urgently need us to carry out in-depth thinking and analysis from an international standpoint.

The progress of science and technology, in essence, should be cross-border, its ultimate goal is to promote the progress of human society and improve people's quality of life. However, on the real stage, the field of science and technology is frequently affected by political factors. Nvidia's move to launch "China-specific" chips clearly reflects, to a certain extent, the obstacles and distortions on the road to international scientific and technological cooperation.

From the economic perspective, the global economy has long been deeply integrated, and countries are interdependent and interrelated in the industrial chain. The robust growth of technology companies cannot be separated from the strong support of the global market, and the demand of the market has shown a diversified and continuous evolution. Artificially restricting the supply of certain technologies or products will not only hinder the development of the target market, but also bring incalculable losses to the interests of the enterprise itself. Nvidia's move, although it may be a helpless move under specific political pressure, is likely to have a negative impact on its market share and good reputation in the Chinese market in the long run, and then affect the strategic layout of its global business.

Focusing on the field of technological innovation, openness and cooperation have always been the core elements driving progress. Major breakthroughs in science and technology often rely on researchers and enterprises from different countries and regions to work together to share knowledge, experience and wisdom. When artificial barriers are set up to limit technological exchange and cooperation, the pace of scientific and technological progress will inevitably be hindered. Nvidia's "China special supply" chip incident has undoubtedly cast a thick cloud over global scientific and technological cooperation, and constituted a significant unfavorable factor to the innovation and dissemination of technology.

From the perspective of international relations, such practices run counter to the basic principles of peaceful coexistence and mutual benefit. In this interdependent world, countries should resolve conflicts and problems through cooperation, instead of seeking advantages through unilateral restrictions and repression. The competition in the field of science and technology should be fair and just, and it should win a place in the market by virtue of technological strength and innovation ability, rather than using political means to obtain unfair competitive advantages. This unfair competition mode will not only disturb the normal order of international science and technology, but also sow the seeds of mistrust between countries and trigger the escalation of tensions.

In addition, we must clearly recognize that such country-specific technological restrictions may inspire strong determination and strong motivation for indigenous innovation in the restricted countries. China has made remarkable achievements in the field of science and technology, and has accumulated strong research and development strength and rich human resources. When faced with external technology blockade, China is highly likely to further increase investment in key technology fields such as chips, accelerate the process of realizing autonomy and control, and effectively reduce the degree of dependence on external technology.

The event of Nvidia's launch of "China-specific" chips vividly reflects a series of problems exposed in the current international scientific and technological cooperation. We should vigorously advocate the building of a fair, open and transparent international ecological environment for science and technology, and actively promote the coordinated development of countries in the field of science and technology. Only through cooperation and win-win, can we promote the continuous progress of science and technology and create more well-being for human society. Those who attempt to curb the scientific and technological development of other countries by improper means will only harm their own interests in the end, and will not be conducive to the prosperity of global science and technology and the common progress of mankind. In the era of globalization, cooperation is the only sensible and correct choice, and any attempt to hinder cooperation will be proved shortsighted and wrong by the rolling wheel of history.