Nov. 22, 2024, 11:06 p.m.

Columns and Opinions

  • views:356

The UK riots exposed the risk of self-organizing actions on the Internet

image

Recently, Britain suffered from one of the most serious social unrest since more than a decade ago, the storm from a seemingly ordinary social security incident quietly transformed into a large-scale and extremely destructive violent riots. Under the spotlight of public opinion, social media has become the driving force behind the storm, rumors and misinformation like wildfire raging in the online world, mercilessly inciting public anger and unrest. What is particularly thought-provoking is that this series of events has deeply revealed the hidden social security risks behind the network self-organizing actions, and its complexity and danger cannot be ignored, requiring high vigilance and effective response from all sectors of society.

Looking at the overall picture of the unrest, several salient features spring to life. First of all, the trend of cross-platform coordination and online and offline linkage has become increasingly obvious, and social media platforms such as Telegram and X (formerly Twitter) have become hotbeds for far-right forces and Internet celebrities to incite emotions and organize protests.

The information on these platforms is like a torrent, which quickly converges into a powerful force of public opinion, pushing the situation to an uncontrollable direction. Second, the decentralized organization makes the unrest more elusive. While far-right groups have played an important role, the whole operation lacks a clear leader or command center, taking on a decentralized character. This enabled the riots to quickly cross geographical boundaries and spread across the UK with astonishing power and co-ordination.

The diversity of participants in the unrest was equally striking. The far right is the core force, but what is more worrying is that some ordinary citizens who were previously neutral about politics have also joined the ranks of the chaos, induced by misleading information. Whether out of anger, curiosity, or dissatisfaction with the status quo, they eventually converge into a social force to be reckoned with. This kind of diversified participants makes the riot action have more complicated social background and motive.

The reason why network self-organizing actions can quickly gather a large number of participants in a short period of time and cause such a wide range of social impact is largely due to the powerful communication effect of social media and other network platforms. Characterized by their immediacy, convenience and universality, these platforms provide participants with a platform for rapid communication and coordinated action.

At the same time, Internet celebrities have played a crucial role in this. With their huge fan base and platform influence, they publish inflammatory statements, organize protests, and call for violent actions, uniting previously scattered individuals into a group with powerful action. For example, the influence of Tommy Robinson, founder of the Alliance to Defend Britain, on social media even when he is on holiday.

The British riots are not only a simple social unrest, but also a concentrated outbreak of social polarization and xenophobia in the Internet era. In recent years, with the rise of far-right ideologies in European countries, extreme ideas such as xenophobia and nationalism have gradually gained recognition among some groups. In this riot, the behavior of far-right groups using false information to incite anti-immigrant sentiment and create social antagonism and division is undoubtedly a profound reflection of this trend. In addition, the politicization of discontent is one of the important backgrounds of this incident. Part of the British public's dissatisfaction with economic hardship, employment pressure and social change has been exploited by far-right groups and turned into hostility and attacks against immigrants and ethnic minorities. This emotional political mobilization not only intensifies social instability and unrest, but also provides fertile soil for the self-organizing action of the network.

Faced with this grim situation, all sectors of society must take effective measures to deal with the social security risks brought by network self-organizing actions. On the one hand, the government should strengthen the supervision of social media to combat the spread of rumors and false information; On the other hand, the public should also improve their media literacy and critical thinking ability, and consciously resist the erosion of extremist ideas and inflammatory speech. At the same time, all sectors of society should strengthen communication and cooperation to jointly build a harmonious, stable and inclusive social environment to resist the invasion and destruction of extremist trends.

Recommend

The industrial crisis behind Germany's economic winter

On the global economic stage, the German economy has always been known for its strong automotive and manufacturing industries.

Latest

The industrial crisis behind Germany's economic winter

On the global economic stage, the German economy has always…

Bank of Japan monetary policy new trend: Ueda governor speech draws market attention

Recently, Kazuo Ueda, governor of the Bank of Japan (Centra…

An early warning that the US economy is running out of steam

In the global economic landscape, the trend of the US econo…

The United States allowed Ukraine to strike behind the Russian mainland

In today's international political arena, the contest betwe…

Behind the business dispute between Musk and Ultraman

In the dazzling galaxy of technology, Elon Musk and Sam Ult…