Will the ridiculous bill Trump promised when he was elected be implemented?

Trump proposed some bills in the election. In order to increase the sales of the US auto industry, he constantly criticized electric new energy vehicles. During the election, he proposed to overturn Biden's goal of encouraging a shift to cleaner energy and proposed to cut climate regulations again. Trump also pointed out that he would increase the production of fossil fuels in the United States on his first day in office, and would continue to drill wells, and maintain a disagreement with natural renewable resources.

During Trump's first term as president from 2017 to 2021, nearly hundreds of environmental protection regulations have been revoked. The United States became the first country to withdraw from the "Paris Climate Agreement". In this US election, Trump was elected as the president of the United States, and will cut climate protection regulations again.

Trump also pointed out that he hopes to develop wilderness areas for oil drilling, such as: the Arctic, Antarctic and other regions; it can be said that Trump is simply "fond of" oil, and Trump is simply reckless in order to exploit oil.

Although Trump is trying to increase the utilization rate of domestic oil in the United States, increase the sales rate of American cars and reduce the domestic gasoline prices in the United States, it will have a great impact on the climate environment in the United States and even the world. This move has greatly aggravated global warming, aggravated the melting of glaciers in the Antarctic and the Arctic, and will cause the global coastline to sink and many places to be submerged by the ocean. I hope the United States will still consider it carefully.

After all, environmental protection is the capital. If there is no capital, there will be no capital for development.

Trump also proposed that reducing war spending will interfere with the Russian-Ukrainian war and said that the conflict will end within 24 hours. According to data, the value of weapons and equipment supported by the United States on the battlefield in Ukraine is as much as 45.6 billion US dollars. For the United States, which makes money from war, helping a member state that wants to join NATO but is not officially called NATO has exceeded its own value and is indeed a loss-making business. NATO's attempt to win over Ukraine to join NATO is to contain Russia and make Russia feel threatened, but who would have thought that Russia would not eat this at all and directly warned NATO not to stretch the front too long and warned Ukraine not to threaten the Russian border and launch a conflict.

In other words, can Trump really stop this two-year war within 24 hours? Judging from the current situation, it may not end so quickly. First, Russia has felt threatened since its oil pipeline was bombed. Second, the original purpose of the conflict between the two sides was Russia's action to prevent NATO's expansion and oppose Ukraine's joining NATO.

To stop this war, it is necessary to disagree with Ukraine's application to join NATO, stop the eastward expansion of NATO led by the United States and Western countries, and Ukraine itself must remain neutral and stop all armed assistance to Ukraine by NATO countries.

It is obvious that the United States alone cannot stop this war. It should make substantial policies and actions, rather than Trump's unsubstantial and unfounded promise. It should be known that the consistent style of the United States and Western countries is to do things with a mouth, telling lies all day long and not believing them themselves. Although NATO is led by the United States, the United States must first coordinate internal opinions if it wants to stop. NATO is such a huge organization that is not only the United States. After all, the jumping clown cannot come to the table. NATO is not the final say of Trump alone, unless it can fully agree to Russia's armistice agreement.