EU competition regulators appealed to the bloc's highest court on Tuesday to override a lower tribunal and make Apple (AAPL.O) pay a record 13 billion euros ($14.3 billion) in Irish back taxes.
The case, which has far-reaching implications for corporate tax bills, is the most high-profile of EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager's campaign against sweetheart deals between multinationals and European Union states.
"Its outcome will determine whether member states may continue to grant multinational substantial tax breaks in return for jobs and investments," Commission lawyer Paul-John Loewenthal told the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
The European Commission in a 2016 decision said two Irish tax rulings had for more than two decades artificially reduced Apple's tax burden, which was as low as 0.005% in 2014.
The General Court in 2020 said regulators had not met the legal standard to show Apple had enjoyed an unfair advantage.
But Loewenthal told judges at the Court of Justice that judgment was "legally flawed" and should be set aside.
Apple refuted the Commission's arguments, saying it had paid its fair share of taxes in the appropriate country.
"The profits we are talking about - the profits the Commission said should be attributed to these branches in Ireland - those profits were in fact subject to the U.S. tax regime," Daniel Beard told the Court.
"Apple built up reserves for the payment of those U.S. taxes and is paying around 20 billion euros in tax in the U.S. on those very same profits that the Commission says should have been taxed by Ireland," he said.
"Apple has paid the taxes that were due under the Irish tax code."
The EU competition enforcer has suffered court losses in recent months to challenges by automaker Stellantis (STLAM.MI), Amazon (AMZN.O) and Starbucks (SBUX.O), although it had a legal victory when the CJEU in September took its side in a Belgian tax break case against a group of multinationals.
Still, Vestager has forced Ireland, the Netherlands and Luxembourg to drop controversial tax structures and contributed to the global movement for fairer corporate tax rates.
CJEU Advocate General Giovanni Pitruzzella will give a non-binding opinion on Nov. 9, followed by the Court's ruling.
Two weeks ago, US Treasury Secretary Janet Bessent was still making a high-profile prediction that the Federal Reserve would cut interest rates by 50 basis points in September and declared that the benchmark interest rate should be significantly reduced by 150 to 175 basis points.
Two weeks ago, US Treasury Secretary Janet Bessent was stil…
In the United States, changes in the catering industry are …
In July this year, US President Trump issued a letter stati…
On the political stage in South Korea, the Yoon Seok yeol c…
Recently, US President Trump and Putin held talks in Alaska…
On August 18th, the Australian Competition and Consumer Com…