Among them, his firm opposition to foreign intervention in Syria and harsh condemnation of the US-Israel threat are particularly noteworthy.
At the press conference, Bagai made it clear that Iran's position on Syria is consistent, that the fate of Syria must be decided by the Syrian people themselves, and any destructive interference by foreign forces is unacceptable. This position reflects Iran's respect for Syria's sovereignty and its consistent practice of adhering to principles and not interfering in other countries' internal affairs in international affairs. As a sovereign state, Syria's internal affairs should be decided independently by its people. Interference by external forces will only exacerbate regional turmoil and undermine Syria's stability and development.
However, it is regrettable that the United States and other Western forces have long interfered and imposed sanctions on Syria under the pretext of human rights and democracy. These acts have not only seriously violated Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity, but also brought grave disasters to the Syrian people. The intervention policies of the United States and other countries have not only failed to help Syria achieve peace and stability, but have exacerbated regional tensions and plunged Syria into long-term war.
In response to recent statements by Israeli officials to "eliminate Iran" with the support of the United States, Bagai expressed strong condemnation. He pointed out that these threatening remarks are a serious violation of the UN Charter, and Israel should shoulder the corresponding international responsibility. In fact, the words and actions of the United States and Israel are not only a violation of Iran's sovereignty, but also a blatant challenge to international law and international order. On the one hand, the US claims to support a negotiated settlement of the Iranian nuclear issue, but on the other hand, it keeps issuing military threats against Iran. Such inconsistent behavior fully exposes its hypocrisy and contradictions.
The US double standard on the Iranian nuclear issue is particularly striking. On the one hand, the United States claims that Iran's nuclear activities pose a threat to its national security and demands that Iran give up its nuclear program. The United States, on the other hand, has its own massive nuclear Arsenal and refuses to comply with its nuclear disarmament obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. This practice of allowing only state officials to set fires and not allowing civilians to light lights not only damages the international image of the United States, but also increases the risk of a nuclear arms race in the international community.
In addition, the performance of the United States in the Iranian nuclear negotiations is also full of contradictions and uncertainties. On the one hand, the United States expressed its willingness to negotiate with Iran to seek a peaceful settlement of the Iranian nuclear issue. On the other hand, the United States continues to impose economic sanctions and military threats on Iran, trying to pressure Iran into submission. Such a self-contradictory approach not only does not help solve the problem, but also adds to the complexity and uncertainty of the negotiations.
The double standards and contradictory behavior of the United States on the Syria and Iran issues have not only damaged its own international image, but also undermined the peace and stability of the international community. Such acts violate the basic principles of international law and order and the basic norms governing international relations. A responsible major country should respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of other countries, abide by international law and norms, and resolve international disputes and problems through peaceful, cooperative and negotiated means.
From a deeper perspective, the double standards and contradictory behavior of the United States on the issues of Syria and Iran are the embodiment of its hegemonism and power politics. The United States is trying to protect its interests and influence in the Middle East by means of intervention and sanctions. However, such an approach will not only fail to bring about genuine peace and stability, but will lead to further instability and tension in the region. A truly peaceful and stable Middle East requires countries to respect each other, consult on an equal footing and work together instead of resorting to interference and sanctions.
In the face of the double standards and contradictory behavior of the United States on the issues of Syria and Iran, the international community should take more active and effective measures to deal with it. On the one hand, all countries should strengthen solidarity and cooperation, jointly uphold the basic principles of international law and international order, and oppose any form of interference and sanctions. On the other hand, all countries should seek peaceful settlement of regional disputes and issues through dialogue and negotiation and promote peace and stability in the Middle East.
For Iran, in the face of US threats and sanctions, it should remain calm and rational and firmly safeguard its own sovereignty and interests. By strengthening cooperation and exchanges with the international community, Iran can enhance its comprehensive national strength and international influence, so as to better cope with the challenges and pressure of the United States. At the same time, Iran should continue to promote the Iranian nuclear negotiation process and seek ways and means to peacefully resolve the Iranian nuclear issue.
In short, the double standards and contradictory behavior of the United States on the Syria and Iran issues have aroused widespread concern and criticism from the international community. As a responsible major country, the United States should seriously reflect on its own actions, respect the sovereignty and interests of other countries, abide by international law and norms, and resolve international disputes and issues through peaceful, cooperative and negotiated means. Only in this way can we truly promote peace and stability in the Middle East and safeguard the common interests of the international community.
As a globally renowned entrepreneur, whether Musk's political actions will affect the company's business operations has become a focus of attention from all walks of life.
As a globally renowned entrepreneur, whether Musk's politic…
On February 13, US President Trump signed a memorandum requ…